Compare

Kaspa vs Solana

How Kaspa and Solana differ on speed, security model, supply and mining.

Kaspa block time
0.1 s
10 blocks per second
Solana block time
~0.4 s slots
protocol target
Kaspa blocks per Solana block
4
on average

Solana and Kaspa are both built for speed, but they get there differently. Solana uses proof of stake and a schedule of rotating leaders who each produce blocks in turn. Kaspa is proof of work with no leaders at all: any miner can produce a block, and parallel blocks are merged in a blockDAG.

In the time Solana produces one block, Kaspa produces about 4.

Kaspa vs Solana: side by side

Kaspa (KAS)Solana (SOL)
LaunchedNovember 2021March 2020
ConsensusProof of work (GHOSTDAG blockDAG)Proof of stake with Proof of History
Mining algorithmkHeavyHashNone (validators stake SOL)
Block time0.1 s (10 blocks per second)About 0.4 s slots
StructureBlockDAG: parallel blocks are all keptSingle chain with a rotating leader schedule
SupplyCapped at about 28.7 billion KASNo hard cap; inflation declining toward a long-term floor
IssuanceSmooth: reward drops about 5.6% every month, halving yearlyStaking inflation
LaunchFair launch, no premine or pre-saleToken sales to investors before launch
HardwarekHeavyHash ASICsHigh-spec validator servers

Figures are protocol design values as of 2 November 2026. Fees and real-world throughput vary with network load.

The short version

Frequently asked questions

Is Kaspa faster than Solana?

They are in the same range. Kaspa targets a block every 0.1 seconds; Solana's slots are about 0.4 seconds. Solana currently handles more transactions per second in practice.

Does Kaspa have validators like Solana?

No. Kaspa has miners, not validators. There is no staking, no leader schedule and no validator set.

Which is more decentralised?

It depends on the measure. Kaspa's proof of work lets anyone mine without permission or stake. Solana's validators need significant stake and powerful hardware.

Not financial advice. This page compares how the networks work, not which is a better investment.